<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[My Visual Database — Strange behaviour with MVD 6.5]]></title>
		<link>https://myvisualdatabase.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=7388</link>
		<atom:link href="https://myvisualdatabase.com/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7388&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Strange behaviour with MVD 6.5.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Strange behaviour with MVD 6.5]]></title>
			<link>https://myvisualdatabase.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=40236#p40236</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m unsure if this is expected behaviour, but I decided to change an existing table from a DATE field type to a DATE/TIME one.</p><br /><p>This causes the table to be deleted in the database and a table labelled&nbsp; table_name_tmp1 to be created which of course is empty.&nbsp; Now this table does contain calculated fields and foreign keys and I wonder if that is why MVD is behaving as it is. </p><p>Another table that I made the same alteration to in the same database, accepts the alteration without deleting the table.</p><br /><p>Is this expected behaviour by MVD?</p><p>Obviously SQLite itself doesn&#039;t know about date types and considers them to be text, so I think it strange that MVD should do what it appears to be doing.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (CDB)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://myvisualdatabase.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=40236#p40236</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
